“There’s nothing good about this guy,” he said. “He may have been a good singer, dancer. But the bottom line is: Would you let your child or grandchild be in the same room with Michael Jackson? What are we glorifying him for?”
How's that for plain language!
6 hours ago
1 comment:
The fact that the language is plain is not the issue for me. What is the issue is that Rep. Peter King is judging Michael Jackson based on unsubstantiated accusations. Michael Jackson was more than an entertainer he was a humanitarian who gave over $300 million dollars to charity.
Post a Comment